Uncategorized

Thunder and Rainbows

Thinking a bit more about sitting shiva.


I was just thinking about silent prayer being a little bit like sitting shiva with God. God must mourn over the violence in China today, and over all the evil, and suffering in the world. What must it be like for God to see his children doing so much to hurt each other.

To be silent in God’s presence can maybe help us to understand better the heart of God.

Slightly unconnected with all of that – my prayer today made me think of this song recorded by Martyn Joseph

The light or the shade, concealed or displayed
Enemies, friends, opposite ends
Bitter or sweet, ruffled or neat
Feathers or lead, silent or said

Generous or mean, corporate or green
Vagrant or lord, the dove or the sword
Distinct or obscure, prosperous or poor
Devil or saint, we are and we ain’t

Intricate mysteries
Life’s secret code
Cul-de-sac signposts
On yellow brickroads
Ambiguous answers
The question’s still “Why”
Thunder and rainbows
From the same sky

Champagne or dust, banquet or crust
Authentic or fake, angel or snake
Flower or thorn, pristine or torn
Desert or sea, the throne and the tree

Intricate mysteries
Life’s secret code
Cul-de-sac signposts
On yellow brickroads
Ambiguous answers
The question’s still “Why”
Thunder and rainbows
From the same sky

The light or the shade, concealed or displayed

Enemies, friends, opposite ends
Flower or thorn, pristine or torn
Desert or sea, the throne and the tree

Intricate mysteries
Life’s secret code
Cul-de-sac signposts
On yellow brickroads
Ambiguous answers
The question’s still “Why”
Thunder and rainbows
From the same sky

Thunder and Rainbows by Martyn Joseph and Stewart and Carol Henderson
Uncategorized

Sitting Shiva Mark 4:26-29

The Kingdom of God is like this: someone scatters seed on the ground. Whether he sleeps, or gets up, night and day, the seed sprouts and grows, though he does not know how.


A few weeks ago, there was a two part documentary on television – ‘Famous, Rich and Homeless’, in which five celebrities spent 10 days experiencing something of what it means to be homeless.

Two of those taking part were actor Bruce Jones (who played Coronation Street’s Les Battersby), and tennis player Annabel Croft. As they were paired up with homeless people, Bruce and Annabel’s first instinct was to try and help them. Faced with the reality of homelessness, they both tried to do something about the situation, and ran the real risk of making things worse, not better. In the debrief at the end of the day, they met up with John Bird, who was homeless himself for many years, and acting as a consultant on the programme. John was angry with both of them for trying to help, and lost his temper at their naivety.

He was out of order in the way he spoke to them, but I think I understood what he was trying to tell them. The most important thing for Annabel and Bruce was to be there with the homeless, and to try and experience what it is like to be homeless. To feel the sense of powerlessness and hopelessness that is part of being homeless.

I don’t know what moved them to want to help. Care and compassion, I’m sure played a large part. Maybe also some guilt and anger that this is allowed to happen. A sense that we should be able to solve the problem of homelessness.

And yet the problem is not a simple one that could be solved by finding their homeless buddy somewhere warm and safe to stay. The root causes of homelessness are complex, and they needed to learn about the problem, not provide a solution.

It reminds me of the ritual of ‘Sitting Shiva’ in Judaism. When someone has died, close family members spend a seven day period of mourning, in which they gather together to support one another in their grieving.

It is considered an act of great kindness and compassion to pay a home visit to the mourners. Traditionally, no greetings are exchanged and visitors wait for the mourners to initiate conversation.

The purpose of visiting a mourner is to comfort the mourner. Visitors have an obligation to remain silent unless the mourner initiates conversation. The mourner is allowed to remain silent, and if so, this shall be respected by the visitors. Any conversation that does take place shall typically be about the deceased. The visitor just has to be sensitive, and let the mourner choose the topic of conversation. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shiva_(Judaism)

The parable of the growing seed in Mark 4 tells us that we are not in control of what God is doing. Some of us find this really hard. Like Bruce and Annabel, we often want to be the ones to help. It’s as if we have failed if we don’t solve the problem. The parable tells us that things can, and will happen without our intervention. We have a part to play, like sowing the seed in the parable, or stepping across the threshold of the home to comfort mourners. But maybe that’s all we need to do. We can let God guide the rest.
Uncategorized

Finished

I cried through the last 20 pages or so of ‘The Hour I First Believed’ this morning.  I’m a big fan of the author, Wally Lamb, and I’d be nervous to recommend the book in case people don’t like it, but I’m going to take a risk and say “Read it!”


It’s been amazing to see how this book, without any conscious plan on my part, has added to the rich experience that I have had these last nine and bit weeks.

The book is about trauma, and about the effects of the different traumas on the characters in the book.  I won’t spoil the story, but the book is also about finding some measure of healing, always with suffering, and sometimes because of the suffering.

I don’t want to labour it, but the true story of Linda White’s meeting with her daughter Cathy’s murderer seems to sum up much of what I have been learning.  (see blog entry ‘Hurt People Hurt People)

The culmination of Linda’s story is her meeting with Gary Brown. (Cathy’s murderer).
For a year, a mediator has met with Linda and Amy, Cathy’s daughter, who was 5 years old at the time of Cathy’s murder.  The mediator has also had meetings with Gary in prison to prepare him for the meeting.  The victim/offender meeting is not about making things easier for the offender; it does not mean that their sentence is reduced.  It is about confronting an offender directly with the consequences of their crime, with the purpose of bringing some restoration to both offender and victim.

By the time they finally meet, they have begun to exchange letters, and both parties come to the meeting with apprehension, and a mixture of powerful emotions.

Linda and Amy tell Gary that there are some hard things that they will say to Gary.  Linda also tells Gary that they are there to listen to Gary talk about his life as well.  Amy tells Gary how his actions have destroyed her life, and describes how as a child, she had numerous counselling sessions to help with the trauma.  Gary sits opposite Amy with his head down, in tears.  

As well as telling Gary what they want him to hear, they want to know what was going on in Gary’s life that would drive him to commit such a terrible crime, and they want Gary to tell them about the details of the final minutes of Cathy’s life.  (Gary was 15 at the time of the murder).  Just watching the interview is painful and distressing.  At the end of the six hour emotional meeting, there are tears on both sides, and amazingly, Linda and Amy ask Gary to come and stand with them, and have their picture taken together.  After having their picture taken, Linda gives Gary a hug, and so does Amy.   “It was hard for me to hug him,” says Amy, “but I felt like it was necessary.” Linda says, “It was the most logical thing in the world for me to hug Gary.”

For me, this story is as good as it gets. What Linda White did mirrors the work of God in Christ.  The path to reconciliation involves suffering – for Jesus that meant death on the cross. The restoration of what has been lost through sin will inevitably mean a path of suffering. If the pain, disruption and destruction caused by sin is confronted, then somehow that pain must be absorbed and robbed of its power.

This is what happened in that Texas prison, sin was robbed of its power to enslave Gary, Linda and Amy.  They were able to take the next step in their lives.

And these things can happen because in the reality of the life, death and resurrection of Jesus, sin and evil were ultimately and decisively robbed of their power to enslave.
Uncategorized

Hagar

Hagar and the Angel by Cecco Bravo

I slept in till 8.22  today!  Got up, and for some reason, checked the rota for today’s 9.30 am communion, only to see that it was me today!  Of course, it’s the 1st July, and my sabbatical is officially over.  


Fortunately, today’s Bible readings for communion were a gift to someone who’s been thinking about conflict and peace building for two months.  The Old Testament reading was all about Hagar, the slave woman who bore a child to Abraham.
In today’s reading, Abraham’s wife Sarah asks Abraham to banish Hagar and Ishmael, so that Ishmael will not have a share in Sarah’s son Isaac’s inheritance.  (Genesis 21). Abraham consents to this and Hagar is banished to the wilderness with her child Ishmael.  In the wilderness, it looks as thought they will both die,  and Hagar moves ‘a good way away’ from Ishmael so that she will not see him  die.  They cry to God for help, and In reply God sends an angel who shows them a well, and they survive.  The significance of this story for today is profound – As Jews look to Sarah’s son Isaac as their ancestor, and Arabs look to Hagar’s son Ishmael as their ancestor.
The story reminded me of the ‘Come to the Table’ project (see earlier blog entry) in which the descendants of slaves, and the descendants of slave owners meet together to share their stories, their pain, and the unmet needs that still exist today.

Would that the descendants of Hagar, and the descendants of Sarah would also come to the table and find peace and reconciliation.

Uncategorized

Does the Blog stop here ?

I’m about to come to the end of my sabbatical, which means the end of the blog (in its present form anyway).  At some point I’d like to give an opportunity for friends at St Nicholas who have read any of the blog to give me some feedback, so I’ll be arranging a discussion evening soon for any that are interested.

If you live away from Beverley, but would like to give me some feedback, I’d be pleased to have a virtual conversation with you.  You can reach me on jonnyfun.e@googlemail.com.
I’m interested to know about anything that was: interesting/boring/annoying/helpful/unclear/challenging/
uplifting/confusing/longwinded/entertaining etc etc.
I would like to carry on with the reflections on Mark’s Gospel, for my own benefit more than anything else, and I might stick those up on a blog.  I’m certain to continue with my explorations into the area of peacebuilding/conflict transformation etc, but whether I’ll make the time to blog those thoughts is anyone’s guess at the moment.
Jonathan.
Uncategorized

Giving, Not Getting. Mark 4:21-25

21-22Jesus went on: “Does anyone bring a lamp home and put it under a washtub or beneath the bed? Don’t you put it up on a table or on the mantel? We’re not keeping secrets, we’re telling them; we’re not hiding things, we’re bringing them out into the open.

 

23“Are you listening to this? Really listening?


 24-25“Listen carefully to what I am saying—and be wary of the shrewd advice that tells you how to get ahead in the world on your own. Giving, not getting, is the way. Generosity begets generosity. Stinginess impoverishes.” (The Message)


You can look at the all of the Ten Commandments as being in some way telling us not to steal.  Whether it is stealing the honour that rightfully belongs to God, or stealing property, or another man’s wife, or stealing the truth ….


Looked at this way, the Ten Commandments remind us that our worst instincts are to make ourselves and our needs the centre of our world; to grab things for ourself; to take rather than give.


I have been thinking a lot about the importance of silence and listening – the silent listening of my Quaker experience at the weekend,

the importance being still and quiet in the face of angry words,

the value of listening to another’s story, especially where it is different to my own.


When I fail to listen to another, but am only concerned to speak, I steal from the other their time to speak, and I steal from myself the opportunity to learn from the other.


May I give time to careful listening, which in itself is a form of generosity.  

Uncategorized

The Diggers


As I came across so many examples of conflict in America that has roots going way back into history, I started thinking about England, and wondering what the equivalent might be for us. 


On Sunday I learned from one the elders at the Quaker meeting a bit of English history that at the same time inspired me and depressed me:

In the 1640’s Gerard Winstanley was living in Cobham, Surrey.  Originally from Wigan, the son of a clothier, he had come to London to learn his father’s trade, and had married the daughter of a surgeon.  When trade between London and Lancashire was disrupted because of the Civil War, his business collapsed, and he went to live in Cobham, where his wife’s family originated.

There he found work as a herdsman for his wife’s family, and partly through his own experience of poverty, was disturbed by the plight of the poor, and especially the powerlessness of those who had been evicted from their homes. Winstanley played a leading role in the early 1640’s in the ‘Digger’ movement by landless peasants to live and farm on common land. 

 ‘He and a handful of poor men established a colony on St Georges Hill to take symbolic ownership of uncultivated common and waste land and came under a great deal of attack.
In addition to collective labour on this farm, which the Diggers occupied, Winstanley wrote pamphlet after pamphlet defending their cause.’

His pamphlets advocated some radical ideas, including the abolition of private property.  
As he looked at the church, whether it was the Church of England or the Sectarians, he did not see anyone really concerned to help the poor.  He came to believe that until everyone had enough to eat, and some security, it was no good preaching pious sermons.  His message was summed up in phrases such as: ‘Work together’, ‘Eat together’, ‘Let Israel go free’, ‘Let Israel neither give nor take hire’.

Winstanley lived on in Cobham until 1676, and in the same year the death of  a Gerard Winstanley, a corn merchant and a Quaker, is recorded in London.  Was this the same man ?  Quite possibly.

On 3rd April 1999, on the 350th anniversary of the Diggers,  282 people set out on a march to St George’s Hill in Surrey to erect a stone in honour of Winstanley. It was common land in the 1640’s.  Winstanley tried to use it as a place for the ‘common people’ to live and work.  The area is now a golf course and private residential area!

The conflict between Winstanley and the ‘powers’ of his day is repeated all over our nation today.  The gap between rich and poor in this country, and even more so globally, is as wide as ever.  For any town/city in this country, I wonder if we could get together people who live in the rich part of town, together with the homeless, people on the council housing list etc, and hear the story of Winstanley, and reflect on what we can learn from it ?

For full story of the march in April 1999 see :
Uncategorized

Come to the Table

One of the things that struck me in America was the importance of history, and seeing how the events of the past still has effects today.

I can’t remember if I mentioned this before, but what some people call the American Civil War is called by others the War of Northern Agression.  In South West Virginia, I saw evidence in the Confederate flags and baseball caps that this war between North and South has not been forgotten.
Of course the effects of slavery still carry on, with African Americans, and people of colour still being disadvantaged by poverty if not by the colour of their skin.
The reaction of some people to trauma is to say ‘Get over it’.  But it is not as simple as that.  Even if the trauma is way in the past, there may still be unmet needs that, if not addressed, will prevent people from moving on.
 
‘Come to the Table’ is a project where the descendants of slave owners and the descendents of slaves come to the table and talk and listen about their past.  
This article says it better than I could
Joe Hairston, who links his ancestry to a slave on a North Carolina plantation, attends a candlelight service at Long’s Chapel.  HARRISONBURG Joe Hairston spent his weekend mingling with descendants of the family that enslaved his ancestors. He came away feeling more hopeful about race relations.

“The fact that the white descendants of white slave masters accept us, and they recognize that we have a common ancestry — that’s an opening,” said Hairston, a retired Army officer who lives in Washington. One of his maternal ancestors was a slave of Hairston planters in North Carolina.

From Thursday through Saturday, 20 descendants of slaves, slave owners and slave traders gathered at Eastern Mennonite University for “Coming to the Table,” a conference that featured storytelling, interviews, presentations and reflections on the institution whose legacy continues to shadow race relations.

Hairston, 83, said sitting down as equals with the families who generations ago held his in bondage shows how far the nation has come. He recalled that when he first joined the Army, he couldn’t be promoted from second lieutenant because a higher rank would have elevated him above whites. Blacks have since have occupied the highest positions of the military and the government, he noted.

“While some people look back and see how bad it was, and forget how good it’s getting to be, I want to forget the past and focus on the future,” Hairston said. “And the future is, we are becoming one people.”

Several plantations in the South now hold reunions for descendants of slaves and of their masters. Organizers of the Eastern Mennonite conference want to inspire more gatherings of several families at a time.

“I see it as a movement that’s going on and that we’re trying to provide leadership and encouragement for,” said William Hairston of Harrisonburg, whose ancestors were a prominent slave-owning clan. He has both white and black relatives.

His family’s tree branches and their origins are detailed in Henry Wiencek’s 2000 book, “The Hairstons: An American Family in Black and White.”

Members of the two sides of Hairstons have been in regular contact since the 1970s. For a decade, William Hairston considered the idea of bringing together both sides of descendants from several plantations.

The idea received a boost from an unlikely place: Monticello, scene of bitter relations between some descendants of Thomas Jefferson and some descendants of his slave, Sally Hemings.

DNA linked at least one of Hemings’ children to the Jefferson clan, and many historians have concluded that the Founding Father and plantation owner likely fathered at least one and possibly all six of Hemings’ children listed in Monticello records.

Still, most members of the Monticello Association, the organization of Jefferson descendants eligible for burial on the Albemarle County estate, considered the evidence inconclusive and have denied membership to the Hemings descendants.

Susan Hutchison, a dissenting association member frustrated by the decision, found inspiration in the more cordial contact among the Hairstons. She sought out the author of “The Hairstons,” who put her in touch with William Hairston, she said. “I wanted to meet other white descendants of slave owners, interested in supporting one another as we face our history together,” she said.

Hairston enlisted EMU’s Center for Justice and Peacebuilding. Amy Potter, of the center’s Practice Institute, found money from the Fetzer Institute in Kalamazoo, Mich., to organize the Harrisonburg meeting, Potter said.

The meeting could set an example for others who trace their family roots to a plantation, Potter said.

“If there are people who are wondering how do we even explore that part of our history and make that connection, there’ll be several examples,” she said.

Diana Redman, a Hemings descendant who lives in Columbus, Ohio, said the weekend helped foster ties between the Hemings and Jefferson lines. Some descendants from both families have been getting acquainted in the past several years.

“The primary thing that happened for us is we had descendants of Thomas Jefferson come to the table in the sense of brotherhood and healing,” Redman said.

After the three days of closed-door conferences, attendees gathered for a candlelight memorial service at Zenda, the Rockingham County hamlet northeast of Harrisonburg where freed slaves settled and founded a thriving community. The conference concluded with a banquet at Community Mennonite Church in Harrisonburg.

Bringing together people who trace their lineage to plantation fields and to the owner’s mansions strikes at the core of racism in the country, said Melody Pannell, a Harrisonburg resident who helped organize the conference.

“We could talk about the honest things that did happen in our families and in America . . . but also how we can build bridges together and take that out into society,” Pannell said.

Contact staff writer Calvin R. Trice atctrice@timesdispatch.com or (540) 574-9977.

Uncategorized

Wait and Listen

A spin off from the value of silent waiting in yesterday’s worship is a thought about responding to the angry words and actions of others.  I find it really hard not to respond to angry or harshly critical words.  I can feel the irritation rising in me, and before I know it I have responded with a harsh, or sarcastic, or equally critical response.

Maybe it is only in waiting and listening that we can find an appropriate response to anger and criticism. Or maybe it is only in this listening that we can discern what might be true in the words spoken to us.  
Uncategorized

Could I be a Quaker ?

This was the question I was asking myself yesterday in the Quaker meeting where  I found myself in many ways ‘at home’


Take this for example: Friends have never regarded [worship] as an individual activity. People who regard Friends’ meetings as opportunities for meditation have failed to appreciate this corporate aspect. The waiting and listening are activities in which everybody is engaged and produce spoken ministry which helps to articulate the common guidance which the Holy Spirit is believed to give the group as a whole. So the waiting and listening is corporate also. This is why Friends emphasise the ‘ministry of silence’ and the importance of coming to meeting regularly and with heart and mind prepared.    John Punshon, 1987

Or this

In this humanistic age we suppose man is the initiator and God is the responder. But the living Christ within us is the initiator and we are the responders. God the Lover, the accuser, the revealer of light and darkness presses within us. ‘Behold, I stand at the door and knock.’ And all our apparent initiative is already a response, a testimonial to His secret presence and working within us. The basic response of the soul to the Light is internal adoration and joy, thanksgiving and worship, self-surrender and listening.   Thomas R Kelly, 1941

There is so much in this tradition that speaks to me: the silent waiting on God, the use of few words in worship; the emphasis on peace and justice;

But in the end, there is something missing, and it’s mostly to do with … the Holy Trinity, and Holy Communion, both of which are at the heart of my faith.  Even so, maybe something of the Living Water that I have found in Quaker worship can be a continuing part of my own experience of God.