Activism · community · Political · Song for Today · Songwriting

We’ve Got A Big House

My wife and I were walking back from feeding chickens for some friends who were away on holiday, and on the way home we passed a big house, with a tall hedge in front.

I immediately felt a rhythm in the words … We’ve got a big house, behind a tall hedge …

It made me think of TV programmes like Escape to the Country where someone looks round a selection of properties with a view to buying … One recurring theme is a requirement for the property to be secluded with no near neighbours.

Writing the song made me think about the rats’ nest that is world politics. It is very tempting sometimes to ignore everything that’s going on and just get on with life …. But …

Here’s the song

Verse 1

We’ve got a big house
Behind a tall hedge
Nobody’s lookin’ in
No-one’s making friends
And that’s the way we live
In these troubled times
Holding on so tight
To everything

Chorus

Do you know what I mean

Do you know what I mean
Can I get some sympathy
Do you know what I mean

Verse 2

We’ve got a big house
Behind a tall hedge
Nobody’s lookin’ in
No-one’s making friends
’Cos we’re not quite sure
If we can let it go
Open up the door
And let you in

Chorus

Verse 3

We’ve got a big house
Behind a tall hedge
Nobody’s lookin’ in
No-one’s making friends
We don’t want to live in feat
So we hide away
From everything

Chorus

Bridge

There are days
when I might make a change
Get a bigger heart
I’ll need a safe space
To make a start

Chorus

faith · Poetry

A Poem For Holy Saturday

Today is an empty day
Yesterday was full
Of waiting for a trial to end
A judgment to be given

Following in his footsteps
But only so far
No further

Behind the corner of a building
I peer round
And draw back
Fearful of being seen

Later I am told

Today is an empty day
Tomorrow will be full
of something
I cannot quite name

The questions almost
Shroud the wonder
But in the end

There is a room
where we will meet
No more hiding
From myself

And he is there

Today is an empty day



Ecology · Songwriting · Storytelling

Clothed In An Earthy Disguise

I have a new song.

It’s taken a lot to get it finished, but I’m happy that the original idea of ‘hiding in plain sigh’ has been realised. I have a recording of it, but I’m not happy enough with it to add it here.

For the sake of brevity, here it is, and I might post some of the back story to the writing at a later date.

I have in mind a walk through a wood, and trying to be quiet, to be attentive to whatever is around me, and sensing something moving in the trees

The song is in part about being attentive to things in general. Spending time and cultivating an attitude of awareness.

Young Deer

Suspicion of a movement
Beyond a curtain of branches and leaves
Suggestion of a breaking
And making a sound in the trees

Young deer, why are you hiding
And biding your time to appear ?
Is it a hint of your presence
Or maybe your absence is near ?

Elusive as a whisper
Breathing gently, blowing free
Fleeting as some distant music
Carried away on the breeze

Young deer what are you seeing
As you flee from the questioning eye. ?
If I stop, and patiently listen
Will you come on by ?

And meanwhile everything everywhere 
Is hidden from our eyes
 Meanwhile everything everywhere
Is clothed in an earthy disguise

Activism · Following Jesus · Jesus · Political · World Affairs

A Babe In My Arms

I have had so many thoughts and prayers over the last nearly two years, but not been able to put into words what I’m thinking and feeling.

Many times I have been on the edge of posting, but not been able to.

Today, I was listening to a short passage from the Gospel of Luke in my daily ‘Pray as you go‘ … here it is:

And the child’s father and mother were amazed at what was being said about him. Then Simeon blessed them and said to his mother Mary, ‘This child is destined for the falling and the rising of many in Israel, and to be a sign that will be opposed so that the inner thoughts of many will be revealed—and a sword will pierce your own soul too.’ Luke 2:33-35

The child is Jesus. Simeon is a priest in the temple in Jerusalem. Mary and Joseph have brought Jesus at 40 days old to present him to the Lord. The words said to Mary are disturbing. They point to the way that Jesus will speak truth to the powers of his day, and the opposition that he will receive as a consequence.

Having listened to the reading a couple of times, I was invited to think about a character that I identified with in the passage. Or maybe I would like to imagine holding the baby in my arms ?

I’m writing this as we are surrounded by ugliness. By actions and words that spread hate and violence.

We are in the middle of the unlawful and genocidal actions of the Zionist state of Israel.
In addition we have to contend with racism directed at those seeking refuge in our land.

All around we see forces at work that are not rooted in compassion and understanding, but cruelty and ignorance.

I imagine myself in the middle of all of this, and ask myself what do I do, or say.

Do I shout out ?
“From the river to the sea …”
Yes, I have joined in those chants, and will still do so.

Do I hold up a placard ?
“Free Palestine, save Gaza”
Yes, I have done that each week in a public space this year, and will continue to do so.

But today, I have an image of myself with thousands of people simply holding babies.
No chants,
No words,
No placards.

Just holding a baby in my arms.

To hold a placard I would need to put the baby down, or give the precious bundle to someone else.

To shout a chant I might disturb this sleeping infant.

The most important thing in my mind is to protect this baby, who speaks to me of vulnerability, of non-violence, of possibility, of innocence.

Maybe this could be a worldwide Christian witness to the self giving love of that tiny babe.
Thousands, millions of people simply holding a baby in their arms.
A witness to the disrupting power of non-violence.

Join me.

N.B. this would be intended as a symbolic protest, in case you thought I was suggesting we put real babies in danger.





Climate Change · faith

How Then Shall We Live ?

I’ve been catching up with a couple of people I haven’t come across before … writer and ex environmental activist Paul Kingsnorth, and mythologist and storyteller Martin Shaw.

Paul Kingsnorth has a very powerful and to me convincing take on the climate emergency- or rather how we are responding to the climate crisis. Essentially the responses are mostly not out of reverence for nature or the planet. They are a human centric response that is recognising the gravity of the situation, but aiming to deal with it in a way that enables us to continue our consumption driven way of living.

It’s a technological way of seeing things. We will, we must, progress in our expertise in devising new ways to enable the human race to enjoy life.

The argument goes – yes, It might mean defacing the countryside with solar farms, but it is all about saving the planet.

The question is – saving the planet for whom ? For the planet ? Or simply as the biggest project in selfishness ever ?

What is inconceivable to most of the human race is to work to consume less., travel less, use less power etc etc.

What is unthinkable is to plan for negative growth. At least for the richest communities.

But unless we do plan for negative growth we’re kidding ourselves if we think we can save the planet – at least, the planet as we know it.

As Paul Kingsnorth rightly says, everything is spiritual. What we need is not technological solutions, but spiritual solutions. (If solutions is the right word, which is probably isn’t)

Why would we expect that establishing outposts on Mars is going to work any better than the mess we have made of our home ?

How then shall we live ?

We need, as a race, to realise that we are not the centre of everything. But there’s a massive problem here, because for the most part, we live in a post God world where the only conversations we have are with ourselves. We’re not willing to engage in a serious conversation with the planet, or with our maker.

In people like Paul Kingsnorth and Martin Shaw, we have interesting signs of a serious grappling with this fundamental issue that everything is spiritual and until we accept that, we’re going nowhere.

Or rather, we’re going, just going.

Activism · Bible · faith · Political

So, It’s Been A While

Around 20 years ago, we came a across a small Human Rights organistion called Amos Trust … named for some words in the Hebrew Bible (The book of the prophet Amos chapter 5) …

But let justice roll on like a river righteousness like a never-failing stream!

The particular aspect of their work that we support is working for Justice and peace in what one middle eastern Christian has called ‘The Land of the Holy One’

Our introduction to this came when we learned about the wall of separation that creates enclosed, shut off areas for Palestinians. We learned about the restrictions on Palestinians, and the many inequalities that they suffer.

For 20 years now, we have been learning about the roots of these injustices … which go back over 100 years – with key moments like the Balfour declaration in 1917, which started the path for the Jewish state, and everything that has happened since.

We’re seeing that all play out in a horrific way now in Gaza, in the West Bank, and in the last couple of days, the escalation in Lebanon.

So – I was looking at a part of Luke’s Gospel, in the New Testament, as I was preparing to take a service last week in our weekday service of Holy Communion.

In the early chapter of Luke’s Gospel, we see Jesus healing people on the edge of socoety – outcasts. We see Jesus healing on the Sabbath, which in the eyes of the religious leaders amounted to breaking the commandment to keep the Sabbath holy. We see Jesus calling working class fishermen to be his close followers. We see him calling even a tax collector. Jesus is pronouncing forgiveness, another aspect of what he’s doing that would have outraged the religious leaders. His teaching is even openly critical of them as rule bound and narrow.

And now Jesus has been invited to the house of a pharisee – for them to check him out. Test him.  See if he really is as bad as they think.

Now there is a woman – described as ‘sinful woman,’ who has very likely heard Jesus, or at least been told enough about him to know that she needs what he is offering – that is, the opportunity for a fresh start. She hears that Jesus has been invited to the pharisee’s house and she turns up. She would have sat around the edge of the room, hoping for some food when the meal has finished. She’s waiting for Jesus to arrive, and she has come to offer thanks to him for his teaching about forgiveness. She has come prepared with some perfume. Maybe she doesn’t yet know how this is all going to work out, but she’s there because Jesus is there. She is there in reponse to knowing that she is forgiven.

Then Jesus arrives. But something is wrong. Simon, the host, does not give Jesus the customary kiss of greeting, or provide Jesus with the oil and water to wash himself. It’s an insult, and everyone knows it. And the woman sees it.

So she decides to do what Simon should have done. She has no water with which to wash Jesus’ feet, but she has her tears, and washes his feet with her tears.

She has no oil to anoint his head, but she anoints his feet with the perfume she has bought.

Simon should have given Jesus a kiss of greeting, so she kissed Jesus’ feet.

I have heard many sermons on these verses, and they have often been used to encourage us to think about our worship. What is it that we bring to Jesus ? The woman brought what was most precious – valuable perfumed ointment. Should we not also offer to Jesus the things that are most precious – our whole self ?

That’s one way to read the verses. I would like to suggest another, that seems to fit with the way Jesus’ ministry is developing.

The woman is acting in solidarity with Jesus. She is confused as to why Jesus has not had the greeting that was usual. She understands that it is an insult. But she is willing to take a risk and do for Jesus what Simon should have done.

And how will Jesus respond, after the outrageous behaviour of the woman ? The assembled pharisees might have expected him, in his position as a religious teacher, (however much they might have been suspicious of him) to be uncomfortable, even hostile to what the woman has done.

But Jesus comes to her defence. He sides with her. He acts in solidarity with her. And by doing so, he will further antagonise the religious leaders and demonstrate that what he has come to do is not limited to working within the boundaries of what they accept. He has come to challenge the very dynamics of power that exist.

And the call to us is to follow his lead. To see where power is being used to oppress, and stand in solidarity with those who are suffering.

We want to stand with all who are suffering, whatever ‘side’ they are on. But as far as the land of the Holy One is concerned, we stand with the people of Gaza and the Occupied Territories of the West Bank, and campaign for a just peace that gives Palestinians equality and dignity that is rightfully theirs.

A Prayer For This Day · faith

I Just Came Across This

In my reading from Celtic Daily Prayer today, I read this:

Being an adult involves carrying a load of responsibilities of our very own, burdens with nobody else’s name on them but ours, with each one of us bearing an unwritten biography whose chapters contain unheard of turns of fortune and unheralded feats of heroism.

Ted Dunne

And this

Be open to the night…

Pray with open hand, not with clenched fist…

Shapes loom out of the darkness, uncertain and unclear: but the hooded stranger on horseback emerging from the mist need not be assumed to be the bearer of ill…

The night is large and full of wonders…

Lord Dunsany

Climate Change · Ecology · Poverty · Songwriting

There’s Something In The Water

I wanted to write a song about inequality and the idea that the rich have unequal access to resources – with the example of a river, where upstream factories and communities are taking all the water, so that the land downstream is depleted.

The end result was a bit different but linked. I’ve played it our band, (The Apple Snatchers), and they like it, so it’s provisionally in the set. We’re looking at doing a couple of gigs in the Autumn, which should be fun.

There’s something in the water,
floating down the stream.
It’s come from up the river,
I wonder what it means.
There’s moonlight on the water,
blue lights in the town
Sun’s up in an hour or so,
soon I will be gone

And it’s not just in the water
it’s everywhere around
You can see the people thinking
to move to higher ground
They don’t want any trouble,
they’ll just let it be
And sometimes these old eyes of mine,
they don’t want to see

And the river is deep, the river is wide –
it’s way too far to the other side.

We need you to survive,
you must carry on
We need you to keep going
or else we’ll all be gone
Can the oak tree stand forever,
its branches touch the sky ?
We can tell most any story,
but it’s hard to live the life.

And the river is deep, the river is wide –
is it too far to the other side ?



Climate Change · community · Economics · Generative and Distributive · Political

Let’s Try A New Direction

So … following on from my last post, and directly connected to the subject of economic growth, I’ve been listening to Rory Stewart and Alastair Campbell chat with Kate Raworth about Doughnut Economics

I saw Kate Raworth a couple of years ago at the Greenbelt Festival and she is going to be there again this year …

She developed something called ‘Doughnut Economics’ (or Donut Economics if you prefer).

Basically, imagine a doughnut, the kind with a hole in the middle. The inside of the ring describes a quality of living that no one should fall below. In other words, if you are in the hole, you are living below an acceptable line of economic well-being.

The outer ring of the doughnut describes the limit of our resources on Planet Earth. That is, if we are living outside the outer ring, it is going to be unsustainable.

Her vision is for thriving, not for growth. That is thriving for the human race, but also for the planet, because everything is connected. Her two key drivers are that life should be regenerative and distributive. Resources should be renewable, and should be shared.

In other words, growth and GDP (Gross Domestic Product) are not the measures we need. Our ability to thrive will be determined by meeting everyone’s basic needs, but without destroying the planet. Sounds good to me.

The podcast above is a great way to get into her ideas, and to hear Alastair Campbell and Rory Stewart respond to her ideas. As political animals, they see all the problems with implementing Kate’s ideas, although they get what she is saying, and appear to be supportive.

The problem is two fold. One is that her ideas would result in a levelling up of economic wealth. The richest would need to accept limitations on wealth in order for the poorest to have their basic needs met. The other problem is time. Even if we tried to move towards the new economics the planet is already past the tipping point.

Kate speaks so powerfully and passionately – and I suspect that unless we aim for something like her plan, we will all suffer the consequences. In the long run, If the poorest suffer, then so will we all. Or as someone else (I think, I forgot who) has said – no one survives unless we all survive.

.